 |
Niccolò Stenone (1638-1686). Anatomista, geologo, vescovo. Supplementum XXXI, K. Ascani, H. Kermit e G. Skytte (eds.), 2000. "L'Erma" di Bretschneider H. Kermit e G. Skytte: Prefazione H. Salvesen: The Holistic Scientist Niels Stensen and the University Ideals and Challengs. S. Holsting: A Homage. H. Kermit: TheLife of Niels Stensen H. Kermit: The Oneness in Niels Stensen's Life. P. Totaro: "Ho certi amici in Ollandia": Stensen and Spinoza - science verso faith. AV. Vad: Polidore and Théophile: the ratinalist and the faithful Observer. J.M. Hansen: Il giudizio di Stenone sulla metodologia cartesiana. T. Kardel: On "Perhaps the Weakest" og Stenone's Works: What Causes Muscular Movement, Inflation or Contraction? S. De Rosa: Cosimo III de'Medici e Niccolò Stenone. K.E. Børresen: Some Approaches to Niels Stensten's Theology. A. Ziggelaar S.J.: L'evoluzione spirituale di Niccolò Stenone giovane.N. Stensen: Chronology. |
 |
Image and relic. Mediating the Sacred in Early Medieval Rome. Supplementum XXXII, Erik Thunø, 2002. "L'Erma" di Bretschneider. INTRODUCTION: IMAGE AND RELIC 1. THE SANCTA SANCTORUM OBJECTS 2. THE ENAMELLED CROSS 3. THE RECTANGULAR CASKET 4. THE CRUCIFORM CASKET 5. PICTORIAL ECLECTISM AND PROGRAMMATIC UNITY 6. MEDIATING THE SACRED AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PAPAL IMAGE THEORY 7. POPE PASCAL I AND THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE PAPACY AS MEDIATOR OF THE SACRED |
 |
The Eloquence of Appropriation. Prolegomena to an Understanding of Spolia
in Early Christian Rome. Supplementum XXXIII, Maria Fabricius Hansen, 2003."L'Erma" di Bretschneider. I. INTRODUCTION II. TRANSLATIO OF MATERIALS III. TRANSLATIO OF MEANINGS IV. TRANSLATIO OF TIME |
 back |
Public Portens in Republican Rome. Supplementum XXXIV, Susanne William Rasmussen, 2003. "L'Erma" di Bretschneider. INTRODUCTION I. SOURCES AND APPROACHES II. TYPES OF PORTENS AND PRIESTHOODS III. CICERO AND PUBLIC DIVINATION IV. DIVINATION AS SCIENCE V. PUBLIC PORTENTS AND AGER ROMANUS VERSUS AGER PEREGRINUS VI. PUBLIC PORTENS. RELIGIO POLITICS, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROMAN IDENTITY CONCLUSION |